Rawls` theory of justice thus represents the Kantian limits of the forms of political and social organization that are permissible in a just society. With M as the advisory framework; R rules, principles or institutions; I the (hypothetical) persons in the position of origin or in the state of nature who make the social contract; and I* am the individuals in the real world who follow the social contract. [6] The social contract is an essential element of democracy. In a democratic nation, government is supposed to be organized to serve the will of its citizens and, therefore, citizens are forced to obey the laws and ghosts of the nation as long as the government is considered fulfilling your mandate and the legislation is considered to be in accordance with the social contract. Legal scholar Randy Barnett has argued[22] that while a company`s presence in the territory may be required for consent, this does not constitute consent to all the rules that the company might establish, regardless of its content. A second condition of consent is that the rules be compatible with the underlying principles of justice and protection of natural and social rights and contain procedures for the effective protection of these rights (or freedoms). This was also done by O. A. Brownson discusses,[23] who argued that, in a sense, three „constitutions“ are involved: first, the Constitution of Nature, which includes all that the founders called the „natural law“; second, the constitution of the company, a set of unwritten rules generally comprehensible to society, formed by a social contract before it established a government by which it established the third, a governmental constitution.