«

»

Říj
08

Before accepting an online trial, model, or service, read what you sign, especially when entering banking data. Check. B who owns the rights to works of art you share, the data the company collects about you, and what the Directive on Deleting Your Data, Content, and Account is. In this short chapter (written for a book by Marciano and Ramello, ed.) to be published, I affirm that the duty to design effective conditions is the superior instrument. From a doctrinal point of view, this means that it is preferable to consider unread contracts as agreements delegation of the design task to the party, which can at least cover the costs, as is the case in German law. Since rational parties will never give a substitute for one of them to insert ineffective terms, standard conditions should only be applied to the extent that they are effective. In addition, economic logic requires that the onus be on the author to prove that the conditions are effective and not on the signatory to prove that they are ineffective. No is factum essentially means „not my act“. Non-factum advocacy has a powerful name, but it`s a defense with very low chances of success, making it a weak defense. Basically, it means that you say this to the court: „I signed this contract, but it`s fundamentally different from what I thought, so I don`t want to honor this contract. Let me go! Depending on the particulars of your agreement, if the main borrower skips the city and no longer makes payments, a co-signer or guarantor of these repayments is on the hook.

Co-signers generally think they are only responsible for „their half“ of the bill, but this is not the case. Guarantors often think that their role is only to vouch for the person who signs the contract and do not realize that they agree to intervene if the money is too short. If you sign a contract, it is usually legally enforceable. There are certain situations where a contract may be considered inconclusive, but they are rare and require documentation. Avoid contractual disputes by carefully evaluating the terms and agreements of a contract before signing it. The law says you can`t use the language barrier as an excuse, the law doesn`t matter if you hokkien, Hakka, Teochew, canton, or the dialect or language you speak – you signed it, you fulfill the obligations. In Saunders` case, one woman, Ms. Gallie, was counting on others to understand the contents of her contract because her glasses were broken and she couldn`t find new glasses before the contract was signed. The court said no that this was not a sufficient reason for them to escape the performance of their contractual obligations. For example, they could say that salary increases are allocated in accordance with their salary policy document. But without reading it, can you be sure that it exists, let alone that it works in your favor? What your new manager says about overtime and dress code may sound good, but is it supported by the document you sign? „All agreements are contracts if they are concluded with the free consent of the contracting parties, in exchange for legitimate consideration and for a legitimate purpose … I`m sorry to burst the altruistic bubble, but helping people by signing a loan with them or agreeing to be a guarantor is often a quick path to ruin, especially if you don`t fully understand the commitment you`re making. For married couples or civil partners (who, from a legal point of view, have certain financial obligations anyway) this is one thing, but it is very different for a friend or relative.

Before signing a contract, you should realistically consider their ability to hold back your end of agreement. If you`re in financial trouble, it may not be a good idea to sign the contract now. . . .